16 Things NOT to Include in a Query Letter


If you want to be published in a magazine or by a traditional book publisher, chances are that you’ll have to submit a query letter at some point. At its most basic, a query letter is simply a letter that details your project and your writing credentials to a prospective editor, agent, or publisher. Yet the query letter is a source of great angst for writers because it is often the only piece of information that a gatekeeper will see before either rejecting your work or asking to see more. When one piece of paper controls that much of your destiny, the pressure to get it right is enormous.

Tons of books and online resources exist to help you write the perfect letter. However, in addition to the things that you should do, there are plenty of things you need to avoid, as well. Here are sixteen things that you should never put in a query letter, unless a fast rejection is your goal.

  1. Mistakes. This is the first contact that an editor or agent has with your work. If it’s riddled with typos and grammatical errors, they aren’t going to take a chance on anything more from you because you’ve already demonstrated that you are not capable of submitting error-free work. Proofread, rewrite, and polish that letter until it’s perfect, and then have someone else (or several someones) read it, too, to make certain that you’re not overlooking something. You want your letter to show you as a competent, careful writer, not as someone who dashes off stuff and submits it without a care.
  2. Gifts or bribes. Writers will sometimes include items like tickets to shows, homemade items, or even money in an effort to get an agent or editor to look at their work. This strategy will always fail. First, it’s unethical for an editor or agent to accept any sort of gift or bribe. Even if they accepted the gift and swore that it didn’t influence their decision about your work, the perception would be there, should word of the transaction get out. (And publishing is a small world, so word would get out!) A reputable agent or publishing house would not risk their reputation by accepting any sort of “gift.” Second, since they aren’t accepting it, it becomes something for them to deal with, either by returning it to you or throwing it away. See number 10, below, for more about why agents and editors don’t want extra “stuff.”
  3. Anything that reveals your stalker tendencies. It’s recommended that you mention in your letter where you heard about the agent or editor, or any personal contact you may have had, such as a meeting at a conference. What isn’t recommended is that you mention that you know the person has three kids, that they go to such-and-such church, that they look pretty in their profile photo, and that you know that their family went to Barbados last year. If you Google the agent or check up on them on Facebook, keep your findings to yourself. Keep any mention of what you know about the agent or editor to the professional realm, only.
  4. Arrogance. Yes, you should give the agent or editor some clue about where your work fits into the marketplace. If it’s similar to a certain successful work, or if it combines elements from two or more successful works, it’s okay to mention that briefly. What’s not okay is to talk about how your book will be the next bestseller, how it will outsell anything by J.K. Rowling, or how it will make millions for you and anyone lucky enough to publish your work. Keep it real, please. If you’re this arrogant and unrealistic in the query letter, the agent or editor is already thinking that working with you will be too much trouble.
  5. “Over the top” language, cuteness, rudeness, or crudeness just to get attention. Your book or article may rely on crude humor, bad language, or a unique voice and you want that to show through in your letter. A little of this can be fine if it is truly needed to represent your work and if it is handled well. But when you resort to this type of language and/or style in an effort to shock or get attention, it will fail. If your whole letter is nothing but F-bombs, baby talk, or crude jokes with no purpose, expect to be rejected.
  6. Your age/photo. You want your work to be judged on its own merits. That means removing yourself from the equation as much as possible. You don’t want an agent or editor to know how old you are or what you look like until they are so captivated by your work that age and looks don’t matter. Most gatekeepers will disavow that age or looks sway their decision but bias, even if unintentional, can play a role. It’s somewhat true in our visual world that younger, better-looking, TV-worthy authors are in demand. If an editor knows how good (or bad) you would look on TV, on a book jacket, at appearances, or in a book trailer that may sway their decisions. Send only your work and don’t include any mention of your age or a photo that you think would be “perfect” on your book jacket.
  7. Anything not relevant. When you talk about yourself and your credentials in your query letter, only mention credits and accomplishments that are relevant to the work in question. Don’t include the fact that you won your 8th grade writing contest. Don’t list your work history unless your work is relevant to the book or article. Don’t mention your hobbies, favorite foods, movies, or books, either. Agents and editors do not care that you love Twinkie’s and Pretty Woman. They only care about the project you are pitching.
  8. Bizarre fonts, papers, and formatting. You think you’re making your submission stand out by submitting it in a 14-point calligraphy font on hot pink paper. The agent or editor thinks you’re being annoying and hurting their eyes. Stick to the accepted conventions.
  9. Anger. You may be angry at the state of publishing these days. You may hate the control that Amazon exercises in the marketplace. You may feel like the little guy always gets screwed, or that those outside the inner circle have no chance. Fine. Embrace your feelings, but don’t rant in a query letter. Your anger is just going to paint you as someone who is difficult to work with, if not downright scary.
  10. Anything not requested. Agents and editors are drowning in paper. The last thing they need from you is anything that they did not specifically request. This means no complete manuscripts or even chapters, no copies of your self-published book, no resumes, no cute drawings that would make “perfect” cover art, DVD’s of your ideal book trailer, and no head shots. You may think you’re saving the agent time by making all of this available to them, but they only see more crap they have to dispose of or send back to you. Only submit what is requested. If an agent or editor wants more, they’ll ask for it.
  11. Multiple projects. A query letter should be for one article or book. Don’t submit one letter that covers the three manuscripts you’ve got stuffed in a drawer, or the fifteen articles you’ve got on your hard drive. One letter = one project. Always.
  12. Incomplete projects. Only query a finished manuscript or a fully fleshed out article/non-fiction book proposal that you are ready to write if given the go-ahead by an editor. No editor wants to read a fantastic query letter only to hear the writer say, “Great. I can have the completed manuscript to you in three months. Maybe four.” You’re not querying a half-baked idea here, or a book of which you’ve only written the first three chapters. You’re not feeling an editor out on whether or not you should continue with the work. You’re querying something which is complete and ready to go, or you need to wait until it is.
  13. Anything personal about you. I’ve already mentioned that you shouldn’t include a photo or mention anything irrelevant in your query letter, but you should refrain from mentioning any other personal information, as well. You may think you’re “bonding” with the agent if you tell him or her that you have three dogs or that you volunteer at a hospice. You may think you’re gaining a sympathy vote if you mention your spouse’s recent death and lack of life insurance, or if you mention that you are disabled. Agents and editors aren’t cold, unfeeling people, but the bottom line is that they do not need to know these things about you. Mentioning things like hobbies or pets only takes up valuable space in a letter that needs to be as brief as possible. Worse, mentioning things like disabilities or tragedies brings up the bias argument again and a gatekeeper will likely steer clear to avoid the perception that their decision was somehow influenced by your tragedy. Talk only about your project and leave out anything personal.
  14. Threats. Never write things like, “Publish me or I’ll get you,” or “If you don’t publish me you’ll regret it,” even if you mean it in jest. You may get a police record in addition to your rejection. People take these things seriously these days, so don’t make any sort of threats.
  15. Excuses. You may not have an extensive resume, but don’t try to excuse it by saying things like, “Well, I’ve written more but just never got around to sending it out,” “I’ve never been published because other people just don’t get my work,” “I’m a slow writer,” or “I have health problems.” Excuses only make it look worse. If you have nothing to add, just remain silent. Worse, never excuse the work you’re submitting. Never, ever say, “Well, the first chapter isn’t the best, but if you’ll ask for the next three you’ll see an improvement.” If the first isn’t the best, don’t query until it is.
  16. Foreign substances. This kind of goes along with not sending gifts or anything not specifically requested, but it happens often enough that it probably deserves it’s own mention. Never send stuff like sand, soap flakes, powder, glitter, salt or any other substance through the mail. You may think that an envelope filled with sand will make the agent love your beach themed novel (I know someone who actually did this – and, no, it wasn’t me), but this is another thing that can get you thrown in jail. Ever since the anthrax scare of a few years ago, the postal service and mail recipients are super sensitive to weird substances in the mail.

A query letter is a professional introduction of your work to an agent or editor. As such, it needs to be kept professional in both tone and appearance. It is not a place to showcase your “creativity” or lifestyle choices. It’s not a place to expound upon your literary greatness or to discuss all the things that you and the agent have in common. Since it shouldn’t be longer than one page, typed, single spaced, and in 12-point font, you have limited real estate with which to work. Make every sentence count and don’t waste them on things that are not relevant or which may actually hurt your chances.


(Photo courtesy of mensatic)

7 thoughts on “16 Things NOT to Include in a Query Letter

  1. Benita J. Prins

    Since I’m self-publishing, I won’t need to be writing query letters to editors, so I was interested in this article as it applied to querying reviewers. Would you say that #3 (“stalker tendencies”) applies to these as well? I remember reading one article that said it was nice for a blogger to see that you’ve actually checked out their blog instead of just running through a list of possible reviewers.

    1. Jennifer Derrick Post author

      I think the same rules mostly apply. It’s fine to say, “Hey, I read your blog and I see that you reviewed such-and-such book which is similar to mine so I was hoping you’d be interested in reviewing my book,” or “A friend who reads your blog all the time suggested I contact you.” But I’d skip any mention of things you find about their personal life.

      Maybe there would be an exception if their blog contains reviews as well as personal information, but I’d still tread carefully. Maybe if you see something like a recipe they’ve shared, that would be fine to comment on, but I wouldn’t comment on anything they post about their kids, family life, health, or anything really personal.

      I think sometimes people share things and don’t really realize how much info. they’re putting out there until someone tells them. Even if you mean well and are trying to build a bond, it could still freak them out and you don’t want to be remembered as the person who freaked them out. I’d just stick to the professional or the blandly personal (like recipes).

  2. Mirka Breen

    Amen to all the above. Glad to say I’ve not been guilty of any, save once addressing a female editor as Mr. {On the other hand, that was the one time this busy editor replied with a personal handwritten note. But it might have been out of pity… 😉 }
    My agent just closed her doors to unsolicited subs because so many failed to adhere to her submission guidelines. She was flooded. Thoughtlessness is not a desirable quality in a client. (Your point #10 and #11)

  3. Pingback: Beware the "One Way" | Jennifer Derrick

  4. Pingback: Beware the "One Way" | Jennifer Derrick

Use Your Words

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.